
Meet the Future Minds 25 Under 25
The Domains
This is where the hardest problems of the century are being worked on, by people who weren't asked to.
The Hallmarks
These are the marks we look for, struck into work that was built long before anyone was watching. We're looking for outliers, people compounding faster than their is “possible”.
Impact
Measurable, named, verifiable change at scale — revenue, reach, policy or law, where the unit varies but the evidence doesn’t. Advances one of the Sustainable Development Goals.
Innovation
Original, unconventional answers to problems the market left unsolved, and to constraints everyone else had learned to accept. Renders the old solution obsolete.
Empowerment
A visible second generation of builders, founders and organisers — others hired, funded, taught, convinced. Started because this person went first.
Sustainability
Durable economics, resilient institutions, long time horizons, structurally built for decades rather than one person’s energy. Outlasts its founder.
Future Minds
Ambitious, unreasonable, generous beyond age or resources, and entirely uninterested in permission. Embodies the spirit of a changemaker.
Frequently Asked Driving Questions
Find quick answers to the most common questions about our programs, process, and learning experience.
Nominees must be 24 or younger on 31 December 2026 — meaning the whole list is still 25 or under at the point of publication. Ages shown on each profile are as of 31 December in the year the list is published. If someone turns 25 between nomination and announcement, they remain eligible.
Nominations open publicly, and anyone can nominate. Every submission is read in full by the Future Minds team and scored against the five hallmarks. The strongest are shortlisted within their domain, so a climate researcher is weighed against other climate researchers rather than against the whole field. The shortlist goes to an independent panel of founders, funders, researchers and past listers. Judges assess only within their own domain, declare conflicts, and never score a nominee they’ve worked with, funded or invested in. Final selections are made by consensus across the panel and the Future Minds team.
Yes, and plenty of listers have. Self-nominations are read identically to third-party ones — we’d rather read a hundred applications from people who put their own name forward than miss someone because nobody around them knew the form existed.




